On May 8, Lennart Bengtsson, a Swedish climate scientist and meteorologist, joined the advisory council of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, a group that questions the reliability of climate change and the costs of policies taken to address it. While Bengtsson maintains he'd always been a skeptic as any scientist ought to be, the foundation and climate-change skeptics proudly announced it as a defection from the scientific consensus.
Less than a week later, he says he's been forced to resign from the group. The abuse he's received from the climate-science community has made it impossible to carry on his academic work and made him fear for his own safety. A once-peaceful community, he says in his resignation letter, now reminds him of McCarthyism.
"I had not expect[ed] such an enormous world-wide pressure put at me from a community that I have been close to all my active life," he wrote in his resignation. "Colleagues are withdrawing their support, other colleagues are withdrawing from joint authorship."
Of course the entire 'progressive' project is idolatry focused on the power of the glorious state - the nation, nay the world's savior from all of these scurrying, independent humans. Big science has become part of this oppressive project - pursuing state power and wealth rather than truth.
The only problem is that hard scientists are trapped by hard facts. They can't manipulate and lie about what is happening very long before people notice the manipulation. And with their predictions coming a cropper again and again and again and with no warming for over seventeen years, and most importantly with no rational scheme to stop what they characterize as an existential threat, they find that they've driven their magic money bus over a cliff. And as it falls, falls, falls to its inevitable denouement, they're panicking.
Discover the cause of the warming, the end of it, why temperatures are (unfortunately) headed down and what to expect.
ReplyDeleteTwo primary drivers explain average global temperature change. They very accurately explain the reported up and down measurements since before 1900 with R2>0.9 (correlation coefficient = 0.95) and provide credible estimates back to the low temperatures of the Little Ice Age (1610).
CO2 change is NOT one of the drivers.
The drivers are given at
http://agwunveiled.blogspot.com/