Tuesday, July 22, 2014

The capital strike continues apace.

Business investment is crapulous. What a surprise.  Apparently to these gents it is because they scurry around for explanations while ignoring the most obvious: regime uncertainty. No one knows what the man in the granny jeans or his bureaucratic minions are going to do next.
From Neil Irwin at The Upshot: 

Five years into the economic recovery, businesses still aren’t plowing much money into big-ticket investments for the future. Nonresidential fixed investment — what businesses spend on equipment, software, buildings and intellectual property — still hasn’t bounced back to its pre-crisis share of the economy, let alone made up for lost ground from the record lows of 2009. As Justin Lahart notes in The Wall Street Journal, equipment spending in particular has averaged 5.2 percent of the economy over the last five years, down from 6.5 percent over the previous half-century. If firms increased their spending enough to close that gap, it would mean an extra $220 billion in annual economic activity and perhaps a couple of million more jobs. But there may be even more important and lasting consequences for this lack of spending by businesses. Capital spending improves worker productivity. And worker productivity improves living standards. Less capital spending by businesses means less investment in the kinds of equipment, software and intellectual property that will make the economy more competitive over the long haul. One simple hypothesis is that it’s not worth spending more on American workers at current wage levels.  As workers, while Americans are quite good, they are just not that much better than a variety of high-IQ individuals in cheaper countries, many of whom now have acceptable infrastructure to work with. - See more at: http://marginalrevolution.com/#sthash.0kQ68Eap.dpuf
http://marginalrevolution.com/

No comments:

Post a Comment