The death of Social Democracy: The Euro's Credit Anstalt moment

Credit Anstalt's collapse in 1931 along with Smoot Hawley guaranteed a depression.  The election of FDR and his brain trust of fascists guaranteed that it would be great.  According to Megan McCardle, we are now facing the collapse of the Euro finance system - a new Credit Anstalt.  And led by a man who has styled himself as the new FDR, this means we are risking another 'Great' catastrophe.  It is a sad day.  But the inevitable consequence of  buying power with other people's money.

Pride goeth before the fall.  Pay attention:  we are witnessing the death of Social Democracy.

There have been some rumbles about Italy for a while.  Italy's budget deficits are relatively modest compared to, say, Ireland, but their debt is about 120% of GDP.  The government has passed a plan that will balance the budget by 2014, but as with most such plans, most of the cutting comes later, while the current cuts are small.  This may well be sensible fiscal policy, given the current economic climate, but it is not reassuring to the markets.  Mike Shedlock estimates that Italy needs to borrow about €356 billion ($500 billion) in 2011 to cover its deficit, and roll over outstanding debt.  Their 10-years are now trading at something north of 5%.  Most of the estimates I've seen say that a debt death spiral becomes likely when rates hit somewhere between 6-7%, because the debt service costs start blowing up the budget deficits.

If Italy goes, it's not clear that the rest of Europe can save them.  In the FT, Neil Dennis says people are talking about doubling the euro bailout fund to €1.5 trillion--or about three times the size of TARP.  And you may have noticed that the bailout fund has not actually stopped Greece's descent into debt madness.  Italy's public debt is not much smaller than Germany's, even though the latter obviously has a much bigger (and richer) economy.  In the event that things really go south on the Italian peninsula, I don't think there's enough money in the rest of Europe to provide a rescue package.

Meanwhile, conditions in the other PIIGSs are worsening.  European leaders seem to be giving up on the notion of some sort of voluntary debt swap after the ratings agencies noted that they would be forced to call this what it is: a default.  Since the Greek debt load does not seem to be in any way sustainable, they're going to have to do something.  Riots in Athens seem to be making it increasingly clear that over the long term, "something" is not going to be indefinitely decreasing their government consumption in order to make debt service payments.  That leaves making bondholders take some sort of a haircut, aka default.  It sounds as if the continent's financial leaders are starting to decide that if Greece's only option is some kind of default, they might as well bite the bullet and do the thing.

This will not be pretty.  For starters, if they default, but stay in the euro, then unless really considerable aid is forthcoming from the rest of Europe, they're going to lose most of the advantages of the euro (low debt premium) while retaining the disadvantages (excessively tight monetary policy for a country that is going to be experiencing capital flight and even deeper recession).  Countries like Argentina got at least some tourism and export boost from very cheap prices after they defaulted and went off their currency peg; Greece won't even get that if the euro remains at an ouchy 1.4 to the dollar.  (If it doesn't remain there, but instead sinks . . . well, that means the euro zone will be having all sorts of other problems.  More on which in a minute.)

Of course, even defaulting and going off the peg is hardly a gateway to paradise.  It is true that after an initial period of horrifying double-digit contraction, Argentina boomed . . . but Argentina was an agricultural commodity exporter in an era when soaring Chinese demand was causing rapidly rising prices in many commodity markets.    And after playing hardball with their foreign investors, Argentina has had limited access to global capital markets, which means they've had to resort to some desperate measures, like seizing the Argentinian equivalent of 401ks, and running the printing presses, to keep the government's finances in balance.  This weekend, the Wall Street Journal informed me that Argentina has now resorted to filing criminal charges against economic consulting firms whose reports indicate that actual inflation exceeds the officially reported numbers by a factor of two to three.

Either way, what Greece does will have implications for the rest of Europe--and for us.  As NPR's Jacob Goldstein says, interbank lending between various European nations, and the US, "looks like a web made by an insane spider".

Once Greece defaults, the immediate outcome is crisis, not calm. Within Greece, they'll need to find some way to close their primary deficit, and stem capital flight, while the economy craters.  Outside of Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy will face growing pressure on their debt.  The euro may plummet--good for German exports, not so good for attracting the kind of capital needed to keep the banking system solvent. And the rest of us will be scrambling to keep the contagion from taking down our banking systems, or our economies.  No one wants another Credit-Anstalt.  But I'm not sure anyone feels quite confident we can prevent it.  As I tweeted yesterday, if the drama continues on both sides of the Atlantic, we may soon get to witness a paradox: where does a capital "flight to safety" go if America defaults while the euro implodes?