Saturday, August 28, 2010

Free people are not dependent and dependent people cannot be free

The fundamental flaw in attempting to create a cradle to grave social democracy on top of a (small l) liberal republic is that the habits of mind and soul that make a people free are undermined by the minutely prescriptive rules and financial dependency that are the social democrats' tools in trade.  Abraham Lincoln's words at Gettysburg turn out to be strangely prescient:

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.



Indeed, we are engaged in a great civil war testing whether a our nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure.  Can a nation be half dependent and half free?  Can one half live off of the other half?  Can votes hand out laurels and regulation build empires?  Or will our love of comfort and safety, our faithlessness and therefore fear of the future turn us in to Aldous Huxley's Alphas, Betas and Epsilons?

Once again, Abraham Lincoln:

If we could first know where we are, and whither we are tending, we could then better judge what to do, and how to do it.

We are now far into the fifth year, since a policy was initiated, with the avowed object, and confident promise, of putting an end to slavery agitation.

Under the operation of that policy, that agitation has not only, not ceased, but has constantly augmented.
In my opinion, it will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached, and passed.

"A house divided against itself cannot stand."

I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free.
I do not expect the Union to be dissolved -- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will cease to be divided.

It will become all one thing or all the other.

Either the opponents of slavery, will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocateswill push it forward, till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new -- North as well as South.


Because at the end of the day when a man is spending half of his labor* in service to and expecting a great part of his sustenance from a soulless state, he is a slave.



*While the taxes are not quite there, the regulations guarantee it and the spending promises to exceed it,

No comments:

Post a Comment