Not particularly earth shattering in itself, but rather telling: When the media targets a public figure for 'debunking', how do you know that you are seeing a clear picture of her? How many 'fact checkers' do you think Obama's portentous books got? One? None?
And when a huge and incredibly complex cache of emails about the central debate of our time is leaked what happens: the NYT says: "they were stolen, we won't report on them" - they of the Pentagon Papers Pulitzers. And AP puts fewer than half the fact checkers that they assign to an unemployed politician's biography.
So the question is this: we make our evaluations of policy and politics based upon the news. But when the news is dishonest or biased or has a monomania on a single issue, how do you figure out reality?
How do you know what is true?
Tricky, very tricky.
No comments:
Post a Comment