10:10 Campaign and the moral bankruptcy of "Environmentalism"

I've often argued that I am a 'conservationist' not an 'environmentalist' because conservation is a human activity while environmentalism is just another word for primitive earth worship.  Now the 'cats at 10:10 have gone and proven my point with a humdinger of a video that shows the detonation of unbelievers and the spraying of entrails and bone fragments and gore over the rapturous (if shocked) faithful.  Nothing could do a better job of explaining the difference.  Thanks gang.  I won't repeat the Vid again because for humans with normally functioning emotions it is too disturbing but I will link to the Acton institute's blog on the subject and excerpt the following quote:
Part of me feels guilty for blogging about this because it is a transparent ploy for attention on the part of people who deserve nothing but contempt, but on the other hand, this film is such a compact and powerful demonstration of the contempt for human life that undergirds much of the modern environmental movement that I can’t resist sharing it. After all, the prerequisite for being comfortable with producing a film that depicts the casual, gruesome murder of one’s ideological opponents (for the greater good, of course) is the belief that human life has no inherent value, and that humans, far from being the crown of creation, are in fact not part of creation at all, but instead a destructive parasite that leeches off of and destroys the pristine beauty of Mother Earth. One may protest that the good folks at 10:10 are just “playing around” or “being funny” or “trying to make a point.” Nonsense. The issue at hand is a disagreement within the scientific community over the interpretation of data. The world is not in imminent danger of destruction. The 10:10 Campaign has no business casually dehumanizing people who simply disagree with them.